In The Giver by
Lois Lowry, the protagonist, Jonas, lives in a future community that values
uniformity, order and what they call “precision of language”. The novel begins
with Jonas struggling with the concept of his future occupation, as he is about
to become a Twelve, and take part in a ceremony in which the children of the
community are assigned their careers. At the ceremony, however, Jonas is chosen
for an exceptionally rare and important job, that of the Receiver of Memory. As
the new Receiver, he is tasked with receiving all of the memories of past
generations of humans from the old Receiver, or as Jonas calls him, The Giver.
The Giver gives Jonas memories of color, snow and sunshine, family and love but
also, tragic memories like loss, pain, starvation, war and the understanding of
death. The Giver explains to Jonas that the Receivers throughout history hold
these memories so that the community can live peacefully without knowledge of
difference or emotion. Jonas always feels uneasy about this, believing that
everyone should be able to feel love and see colors and hear music, even if it
means that they can suffer. He is then forced into action when he realizes that
the elders, troublemakers and undesirable babies that are “released” from the
community are actually killed. He and The Giver agree that the community must
go back to the times where everyone had memories to stop the injustices of
their society. In order to do that, Jonas escapes his community with a baby
scheduled for release so that his memories will return to the populace.
This
text is critical in the genre of adolescent literature because it explores a
number of characteristically adolescent themes and how they interact within a
protagonist of a dystopian society. Some of these key themes that could be
explored further are the newfound understanding of death, the need to escape
from the rules and corruption of society and the adolescent propensity to realize
their own agency and use it to make significant change.
The
theme of death and how it is portrayed in this novel was especially fascinating
because it also ties into the community’s use of “precise language” to keep
their citizens from contemplating abstract concepts like love, justice and
suffering. The community uses the term “release” to reference death, choosing
to use a vague euphemism to describe an act that would usually result in fear
or loss or mourning. The elders of the community are released with a glorifying
ceremony, delinquents who repeated break rules are released and, most
disturbingly to Jonas, babies who are not big or strong enough are released as
well. Death is all around this society but only Jonas and The Giver have any
recollection of the consequences of killing the outliers of society. Once Jonas
realizes that his father regularly kills babies as his job and is planning on
killing Gabe, the baby that he has bonded with or even shared memories with,
because he cries too much at night, he feels that the society must sacrifice
their relative peace to once again have a full understanding of the
consequences of their actions.
Jonas’
realization of his own agency throughout the text is also a key element that
could be discussed at length. The transformation from powerless to empowered
that Jonas goes through is a vital part of his character development as an
adolescent and as a dystopian hero. At the beginning of the text, Jonas is
significantly worried that he will not fit into his new life as an adult with
career but he still places his faith in the Elders that they chose the proper
path for him and that he must follow it, whatever it is. His existence up to
this point has been entirely in the hands of others, with ever present rules
such as scheduled curfews, not being allowed to ride a bike until a certain
age, or having to take a pill to stop the “Stirrings” of emotion. This all
changes when Jonas becomes the Receiver. His newfound ability to act according
to his own conscience is helped along by his career instructions allowing him
to lie and to be excused from dream telling and from taking his “Stirrings”
pill. Choices that have never been available to him are now and although he
does not use them often, it is empowering to even have a say in the decision. As
Jonas receives good memories and feelings, he takes it upon himself to share
these feelings to as many people as possible. He tries to explain love to his
family but they can only understand lesser feelings of pride or enjoying one’s
company. The only person he can effectively share memories with is Gabe and
while that does bond them together, Gabe cannot really communicate with Jonas
to experience those feelings together. This realization of agency is also vital
in Jonas’ quest to escape the society and help it to improve in the future.
The
last theme that I could discuss is the adolescent’s proclivity to see the corruption
of institutions and be empowered enough to try to change it. Through receiving memories,
Jonas has new insight into the true workings of the world and how the life that
he and his community have lived is a dull and often unjust version of it. In
order to bring the community back to the way it was before they lost their
memories, Jonas must leave the community and find Elsewhere because as soon as
the memories leave the community, they are given back to the people. Jonas sees
that his family and friends are suffering without even knowing that there could
be a better way so with his newly discovered agency as an individual, he takes
it upon himself to defy his society and leave. This adolescent trope of leaving
society to find real truth and knowledge is modified in this story with the
juxtaposition of The Giver’s part in Jonas’ plan. He has long desired to give
the memories back to the people but never had the courage and when the plan
does go into effect, instead of going away with Jonas, he vows to stay with the
community and help them through their initial confusion so that they may come
to terms with it and live better lives. This shows that while Jonas is
certainly more grown up than he was at the beginning of the novel, he still
does not quite have the adult wisdom to realize that reform must also come from
within society, not just by criticizing and abandoning it.
Hello Colleen,
ReplyDeleteTwo other students are working on The Giver, so rather than repeating all of my recommendations, I just recommend that you read my comments on their posts with article recommendations for The Giver. The great and terrible thing about working with The Giver is that there are a ton of sources. I do not think I recommended Don Latham's articles to the others, but in particular he has one called "Childhood Under Siege" that might be useful to your negotiation of adolescence in the novel. It will be difficult for each of the three of you to find your own take on the novel amidst all of this scholarship, so I want to try to avoid offering you the same advice. Maybe you can look at the negotiation of adolescent power, relying on Trites' discussion of this trope, when the Dystopian world has rendered so many of the institutions they would negotiate/ rebel against invisible. So, for instance, I like your discussion of death in the novel. Can an adolescent negotiate their power in relation to death if they do not know death is a concept? How pivotal is Jonas's knowledge of these basic human power structures, particularly death and sexuality, to his ability to rebel? There may also be room in your essay to pick up the question of whether or not he successfully rebels or merely escapes (or neither if he is dead).
Hey Colleen,
ReplyDeleteI'm also going to be working with The Giver. I can already see how are papers are going in different directions. I think it would be interesting to look at adolescent power dynamics in the book, especially as it pertains to death and how adolescents can rebel in the novel.
An article you may find useful is "Discipline and Its Discontents: A Foucauldian Reading of The Giver"
by Latham, Don
Best of luck to you on your paper and research!
Hi Colleen!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your overview and analysis of The Giver, and am more encouraged to read it now myself. I do not know the book as well, but the themes you discussed in your post sounded very similar to other books we read in the class. Perhaps you could compare The Giver to another book that explores the futility of rebellion such as The Chocolate War. An even better comparison may be with that of Feed, since it embodies the futility of adolescent rebellion, is dystopian, and the characters in this novel also do not have any concept of death.
As far as scholarship goes for your project, I would certainly use Disturbing the Universe to underlie much of your argument. I also found this article that related both to Trite's book and The Giver. It is called Discipline and its discontents: a Foucauldian reading of The Giver, by Don Latham.
Here is the link if you are interested: http://uh7qf6fd4h.search.serialssolutions.com/?paramdict=en-US&genre=article&spage=134&SS_issnh=0092-8208&SS_eissnh=1543-3374&SS_sid=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&issn=00928208&SS_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fufl.summon.serialssolutions.com%2Fsearch%2Fresults%3Fq%3Dthe%2Bgiver&date=2004&aulast=Latham&externaldocid=R03642554&atitle=Discipline+and+its+discontents%3A+a+Foucauldian+reading+of+The+Giver&title=Children%27s+Literature%3A+annual+of+the+Modern+Language+Association+Division+on+Children%27s+Literature+and+the+Children%27s+Literature+Association&eissn=15433374&localeid=1033&aufirst=Don&jtitle=Children%27s+Literature%3A+annual+of+the+Modern+Language+Association+Division+on+Children%27s+Literature+and+the+Children%27s+Literature+Association¶mdict=en-US&SS_LibHash=UH7QF6FD4H&sid=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&SS_authors=Latham%2C+Don&SS_source=56&l=UH7QF6FD4H&SS_ReferentFormat=JournalFormat&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&au=Latham%2C+Don&PP=true&volume=32&SS_RequestType=1&&SS_PostParamDict=disableOneClick