Lumberjanes Response: Category A, Prompt 1
Lumberjanes
is a comic book series that focuses on five teenage girls (Jo, April, Mal,
Molly, and Ripley) in a summer camp and their encounters with magical
creatures, puzzles, and secrets. Throughout Lumberjanes,
there are various different adolescent themes prevalent, ranging from curiosity/exploration
to power and rebellion. One of the main themes in the story, though, unlike
some of the other adolescent texts read during this semester, is the criticism
of heteronormative gender roles/expectations. The comic engages this theme in a
few ways, the most obvious being the title of it; the word “lumberjanes” is a
twist on the gendered word “lumberjack,” which originally excluded women (due
to assumptive heteronormative gender roles when the word was coined). The comic
also does this by including Jo as a transgender main character and openly
romancing Molly and Mal together.
However, there is a particular passage in
the text in which the authors of Lumberjanes
heavily criticize societal heteronormativity pressure than in other instances:
the scene in which the Lumberjanes visit the Scouting Lads’ cabin. Prior to
entering the cabin, Jo comments to April that she feels, “something’s not
right.” She then goes on to explain that
her “gut” was telling her not to trust the Scouting Lads. However, upon
entering their cabin, Jo’s qualms and feelings of suspicion simmer down. The
Lumberjanes, along with their leader Jen, comment on how kind and clean their
cabin was. Some of the boys begin to serve them cookies and provide them
healing cream for all of their poison ivy rashes. This moment alone in the
passage breaks against the heteronormative stereotype that boys are “messy” and
“disorganized.” Instead, in this moment, the Scouting Lads are empowered by
being depicted as nurturing, caring, and orderly, traits commonly associated,
in a heteronormative lens, as “feminine.”
In contrast to them, the Scouting Lads’
leader is portrayed as overtly masculine, aggressive, disruptive, and problematic.
His first lines in the text are, “WHAT THE BEJABBERS IS GOING ON HERE? I
THOUGHT I HEARD TEA KETTLE. PATHETIC.” Here, Lumberjanes is calling attention to the fact that the leader is so cisgendered and caught up with
heteronormative gender roles that he doesn’t see how ridiculous it is for him
to have a problem with the Scouting Lads simply making tea. His
hypermasculinity also causes him to act misogynistic towards the Lumberjanes
and Jen. His first words to them are, “GIRLS? EW.” He proceeds to argue with
Jen for no real apparent reason and calls her stupid to the point where his
face his red and his temples are throbbing. Turning to the Scouting Lads, the
leader says, “COOKIES ARE FOR THE WEAK. REAL MEN SHOULD BE SPLITTING UP WOOD
AND SMOKING PIPES.” He then slaps the cookie tray out of one of the boys’
hands, causing the boy to cry out, “But I LIKE baking cookies.” Once he is gone,
the Lumberjanes, annoyed, begin talking about the incident. One of
them, Barney, comments on his leader, saying, “He’s the WORST.”
Here, readers are able to see the comic’s
direct commentary on heteronormative expectations/gender roles; it views it as
both problematic and unnecessary. The hyperbolized leader, for that reason, is
included in order to help make readers understand that criticism. The incident
with the cookies also serves as a moment to shed light on the notion that
gendering an act, like baking cookies, is ridiculous and absurd. Lumberjanes continues to revisit this
theme throughout the text and even closes its first volume on the cliffhanger
of the hypermasculine leader “mind controlling” all of the Scouting Lads.
Hi Josie,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your take on the criticism found within the text. One related aspect that I found to be particularly interesting was the seemingly romantic relationship between two of the girls. The book doesn't treat this romance as something atypical at all. Rather than calling attention to the fact that it is a book that has included a non-traditional relationship, the book includes the relationship without drawing attention to the fact.
I think you did a great job focusing on the criticism behind heteronormativity in the graphic novel.
ReplyDeleteHi Josie,
ReplyDeleteThis is a good close reading of gender identity in Lumberjanes. The characterization of the scout leader appears to be absurd in itself, but when I think about how women are portrayed in comics and popular media sometimes, I think it might actually be reflective of what happens when we reduce an identity down to their gender norms and nothing else. That camp director is just masculinity on steroids. I agree that this scene highlights the absurdity of viewing an action like baking cookies gendered and invites us to question male-gendered activities too, like repairing cars, etc.